Skip to main content

Pentagon Estimates 2,000 To 4,000 Russian Troops Killed In Ukraine War

 

Axios: U.S. estimates 2,000 to 4,000 Russian troops killed in Ukraine war 

The U.S. assesses with "low confidence" that between 2,000 and 4,000 Russian troops have been killed over the course of Vladimir Putin's 12-day war in Ukraine, Defense Intelligence Agency Director Scott Berrier testified Tuesday. 

Why it matters: The estimated number of casualties is "far in excess" of what Russia anticipated or has publicly acknowledged, according to U.S. intelligence officials. Putin has still not achieved his initial goal — seizing Kyiv within two days — and may turn to more brutal tactics in the coming days and weeks. 

The big picture: Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines testified at Congress' annual worldwide threats hearing that Russia "underestimated the strength of Ukraine's resistance and the degree of internal military challenges," which include "an ill-constructed plan" and issues with morale and logistics.

Read more ....  

WNU Editor: It is hard to calculate how many Russian soldiers have been killed so far in the Ukraine invasion. I try to get some measure of it from Russian social media and open sources, and I am the first to admit that it is impossible to make any estimate. 

As for U.S. intelligence estimating between 2,000 to 4,000 soldiers killed. These officials are saying the same thing that I am saying .... it is based on data that they have "low confidence" in. 

 But there is a reference point that can be used to make an estimate, and that is the first and second Chechen wars where estimates are that Russian casualties were between 20,000 to 40,000 killed (Causalities first Chechen war, Second Chechen war). 

Both Chechen wars were unbelievably brutal and scorch earth, and took years to resolve. If this is where the Russia - Ukraine war is headed, I can easily Russian casualties at almost 100,000 killed, but the casualty count on the Ukrainian side, especially among the civilian population, will be in the hundreds of thousands killed (if not more) and half of the country displaced both internally and externally. 

One other note. A senior U.S. defense official told reporters that approximately 5% of Russia's weapons and vehicles have been destroyed or "rendered inoperable" during the war. After almost two weeks of intense war I find that number to be surprisingly small, and what is more sobering is that this equipment has probably already been replaced. With the number of anti-tank/armor weapons that the Ukrainian military has, I expected a much higher number. 

Pentagon Estimates 2,000 To 4,000 Russian Troops Killed In Ukraine War  

Pentagon Estimates Thousands of Russian Troops Have Been Killed in Ukraine -- Military.com  

Pentagon estimates 2,000 to 4,000 Russian soldiers killed in Ukraine -- France 24  

U.S. Military Intelligence Estimates Russian Troop Deaths Reach 4,000 -- Newsweek  

Estimates Vary on Russian Troop Deaths in Ukraine Since Invasion -- US News and World Report



from War News Updates https://ift.tt/eVLE5J7
via IFTTT

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Bath Iron Works starts building new Arleigh Burke-class Flight III destroyer USS J. William Middendorf

General Dynamics Bath Iron Works has started construction of the future USS J. William Middendorf (DDG 138), a Flight III Arleigh Burke-class destroyer that will strengthen the U.S. Navy’s missile-defense and escort capacity during sustained operations in the Red Sea, Eastern Mediterranean, and Indo-Pacific. The ceremonial first steel cut took place in Maine on May 19, 2026, as the Navy continues relying on Flight III destroyers equipped with the SPY-6 radar and Aegis Baseline 10 combat system to replace the air defense and command role of retiring Ticonderoga-class cruisers ahead of the future DDG(X) program.  Read full defense news at this link... USS J. William Middendorf belongs to the Flight III configuration that began with USS Jack H. Lucas (DDG 125), the first Flight III destroyer commissioned in October 2023. (Picture source: US Navy) Read more... from World Defence News https://ift.tt/tSRkVWI via IFTTT

China’s PHL-191 MLRS Shows How Airburst Munitions Could Transform Modern Battlefield Suppression

 China has showcased what appears to be an airburst-capable munition fired from its PHL-191 long-range modular multiple launch rocket system during a live-fire exercise, highlighting a growing emphasis on suppressing dispersed battlefield targets rather than relying solely on point strikes. Footage released on July 19, 2026, by China Military Online and the Chinese Ministry of National Defense suggests the PLA is expanding its long-range fire-support options with effects designed to disrupt troops, air-defense sites, and lightly protected equipment across a wider area, reinforcing its ability to shape the battlefield before major combat operations begin.  Read Full Defense News At This Link. New PLA footage shows China’s PHL-191 rocket artillery system delivering concentrated, apparent airburst fragmentation effects against dispersed battlefield targets (Picture Source: Chinese Ministry of National Defense) from World Defence News https://ift.tt/jYnGm7H via IFTTT

US Navy considers Ford-class aircraft carrier redesign to match Trump's WWII island style preference

On August 16, 2026, the U.S. Navy initiated an operational and technical evaluation regarding whether to move the island superstructure on future Ford-class aircraft carriers from its current far-aft placement toward amidships, following directive preferences from President Donald Trump. The assessment will likely focus on whether relocating the command structure toward a World War II-era configuration would negatively impact flight deck operations, sortie generation rates, and recovery airflow dynamics. This design review also follows an August 13 directive ordering the Navy to replace the Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System and Advanced Weapons Elevators on the future USS Doris Miller with steam catapults and hydraulic systems.  Read full defense news at this link... The USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78) places its island much farther aft so more aircraft can be parked and moved directly toward the catapults without interfering with landings, whereas USS Enterprise (CV-6)'s amidship...